With the evolution of technology, there has been a shift in the consumer market. From regular TVs to Smart TVs and from headphones to earbuds, audio technology has seen a progressive advancement, evolving. When we talk about soundbars, there are many choices available in the market.
Among those choices are Dolby Atoms and Aura 3D. They may perform the same functions but certain characteristics make them different from each other.
A consumer always wants a satisfactory auditory experience and to do that they need to research the best available options. Therefore, the information in the following article aims to differentiate and define both soundbars.
Dolby Atmos VS Auro 3D Which is Best?
Lets explain both in detail and then we will compare both dolby atmos and auro 3d.
What is Dolby Atmos?
Dolby Atmos is also a sound decoder but with some unique features that are not found in the Dolby Digital. Dolby Digital uses vertical technology to turn the two-dimensional virtual audio into a three-dimensional real sound experience.
With the additional speakers placed on the top of the device, the sound waves not only echo from the walls of the room but also the ceilings and the floors. Such a movement in the soundwaves enables the user to feel as if they are inside the TV set living the screen instead of sitting in front of it.
The technology enables the sound to be treated as an individual object rather than just waves. Once the sound object tech is used, the sound can travel independently in every direction rather than just traveling in straight channels.
What is Auro 3D?
Just like Dolby Atmos Auro3D is an audio decoding technology that relies on a layered format to approach the audio in multi-dimension. The technology is layered on top of each other in a pile and two systems are merged to form one.
Auro3D uses channel-based technology and usually required many speakers to function. It uses a minimum of nine channels and a 9.2 receiver, along with an addition of four speakers. Auro3D works best with rooms with high ceilings.
Auro3D is famous for its great sonic results and turns your home into a theatre.
What is the Difference?
To differentiate between the two sound systems, we must consider a few factors. First of all, we talk about the space required for Auro3D and Dolby Atmos. For Dolby Atmos, the space required is much lesser than that of Auro3D.
Secondly, the area that Dolby Atmos covers is limited whereas Auro3D has a wider range when it comes to a great auditory experience. The sound quality is good in both cases, but if installed with all its components, Auro3D is better.
Auro3D consists of technology that uses layered sound systems while Dolby Atmos uses vertical sound technology to create the three-dimensional sound effect. Both can produce adequate secondary sounds and background noise adjustment.
While Auro3D is a channel-based technology, Dolby Atmos is an object-based one which means that they both use different procedures to amplify and decode the sounds.
Which One is Better?
Comparing the two sound systems can provide us with a better view of which sound system to purchase. When it comes to Dolby Atmos, there are many great features associated with this technology. To begin with, Dolby Atmos gives a real-life-like auditory experience using its three-dimensional sound technology.
Not only does Dolby Atmos provides the best primary sound quality but also enhances the secondary sounds. Apart from quality, Dolby Atmos required a minimum of four speakers which are placed in a way that doesn’t occupy a lot of space and is well-hidden from the aesthetic point of view.
Both the sound systems are costly but with some changes, Dolby Atmos can have its cost minimized to a reasonable figure. The problem with Dolby Atmos is that it requires certain room specifications without which it cannot function very well.
Dolby Atmos requires a nine to ten feet flat ceiling which might ensure that the sound quality is different in different parts of the room. The reflective speakers do not add to the sound quality either and there is a scarcity of source material available at Dolby Atmos.
When it comes to Auro3D, the sound quality is amazing, which includes primary and secondary sounds. Speaking of room compatibility, Auro3D would work in any room as long as it does not have a low ceiling.
Auro3D requires a lot more space for its speakers and does not provide an aesthetic view. The cost of Auro3D technology along with all its components is very high but the quality of sound is uniform in the entire room.
Just like Dolby Atmos, Auro3D has a lack of content availability and source material but it’s a progressive path and more content can be hoped for in the coming future.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Why Does Auro 3D Require so Much Space?
There is an installment of 4 bookshelf speakers on the walls whether it’s a 5.1 or a 9.1 system, the latter taking up more room.
Why are High Ceilings Important in the Auro 3D Technology?
For Auro3D technology to work to its full potential, one must ensure that there is enough space between the upper speakers and the lower speakers. When a room has a low ceiling, the lack of distance prevents the technology from working in its best form.
Which Soundbar is More Cost-Effective?
Although both soundbars are expensive Dolby Atmos technology can be acquired at a more reasonable rate than Auro3D.
Conclusion
Dolby Atmos looks like a better option considering space management and cost analysis. As far as compatibility is concerned, Auro3D is the clear choice whereas the content is limited for both the sound systems.
Mia Evelyn is a soundbar specialist and she love to test and review different soundbar brands. She shares her neutral and in-depth reviews through the Soundbar Mag.
